200 A.2d 683
[No. 354, September Term, 1963.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided May 29, 1964.
LARCENY — Evidence Was Sufficient To Convict. p. 131
H.C.
Decided May 29, 1964.
Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore (OPPENHEIMER, J.).
Duke Wilson was convicted of larceny and from the judgment entered thereon, he appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
The cause was submitted on the brief to HENDERSON, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and SYBERT, JJ., and KEATING, J., Associate Judge of the Second Judicial Circuit, specially assigned.
Submitted by Nathan Stern for appellant.
Submitted by Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, Franklin
Page 131
Goldstein, Assistant Attorney General, William J. O’Donnell an David T. Mason, State’s Attorney and Assistant State’s Attorney, respectively, for Baltimore City, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The only question raised by the appellant is an alleged insufficiency of the evidence to convict him. A reading of the record extract discloses ample evidence, if believed by the trier of facts, to warrant the conviction of larceny.
The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.