107 A. 157
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided January 16, 1919.
Negligence: damages; “physical injury.” Variance: failure to prove all damages claimed — not.
In an action for damages, “physical injury” is not limited to injuries of which there is external manifestation.
In an action for damages for negligence, it is not a variance for the evidence to fail to prove all kinds of injury set forth in a declaration.
Decided January 16, 1919.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. (PETER and WORTHINGTON, JJ.)
The plaintiff while riding upon one of the cars of the defendant corporation was injured by the collision of that car with another; in a suit brought by her for damages, the verdict was in her favor for $2,000.00; from the judgment entered on that verdict this appeal was taken.
The cause was argued before BOYD, C.J., BURKE, THOMAS, PATTISON, URNER and STOCKBRIDGE, JJ.
William H. Talbott, for the appellant.
John A. Garrett and Charles W. Prettyman, for the appellee.
The decision was affirmed, with costs, on appeal, in an opinion by BOYD, C.J.
Page 691
135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…
244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…
Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…
John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…
127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…
34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…