114 A. 926
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided January 13th, 1921.
Dismissal of Appeal.
The burden is on the appellant to show that the delay in transmitting the record to the Court of Appeals was due to the neglect or inability of the clerk or to the appellee.
Decided January 13th, 1921.
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (SOPER, C.J.).
The cause was argued before BRISCOE, THOMAS, URNER, STOCKBRIDGE, ADKINS, and OFFUTT, JJ.
Christopher R. Wattenscheidt and Laurie H. Riggs, for the appellant.
Lee I. Hecht, for the appellee.
Per curiam opinion
Page 1
135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…
244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…
Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…
John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…
127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…
34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…