WANNER v. HORNBECK HINTON, INCORPORATED, 137 Md. 694 (1921)

114 A. 926

EMANUEL WANNER vs. HORNBECK HINTON, INCORPORATED.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided January 13th, 1921.

Dismissal of Appeal.

The burden is on the appellant to show that the delay in transmitting the record to the Court of Appeals was due to the neglect or inability of the clerk or to the appellee.

Decided January 13th, 1921.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (SOPER, C.J.).

The cause was argued before BRISCOE, THOMAS, URNER, STOCKBRIDGE, ADKINS, and OFFUTT, JJ.

Christopher R. Wattenscheidt and Laurie H. Riggs, for the appellant.

Lee I. Hecht, for the appellee.

Per curiam opinion

Page 1

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 114 A. 926

Recent Posts

NOTTINGHAM v. STATE, 135 A.3d 541 (2016)

135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…

1 week ago

STATE v. SAYLES, 244 A.3d 1139 (Md. App. 2021)

244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…

2 years ago

MILBURN v. STATE, 1 Md. 1 (1851)

Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…

3 years ago

HANDY v. COLLINS, 60 Md. 229 (1883)

John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…

3 years ago

CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK, 445 A.3d 554 (2015)

127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…

5 years ago

STOP SLOTS MD 2008 v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 34 A.3d 1164 (2012)

34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…

7 years ago