197 A.2d 920
[App. No. 30, September Term, 1963.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided March 6, 1964.
POST CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT — Second Petition Under Act Presented No Grounds For Relief Which Could Not Reasonably Have Been Raised In First Petition — Trial Court Justified In Dismissing Second Petition — Maryland Rule BK48. p. 609
Decided March 6, 1964.
George E. Walton, Jr., instituted a second proceeding under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, and from a denial of relief, he applied for leave to appeal.
Application denied.
Before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and SYBERT, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
This is an application to appeal from the denial of relief under a second petition for relief under the U.P.C.P.A. Under his first petition, all of his contentions were considered and rejected, after the court had appointed counsel to assist him. His present petition contains no grounds for relief which could not reasonably have been raised in his first; hence the trial court was justified in dismissing his petition. Maryland Rule BK48.
Application denied.
Page 610