167 A.2d 888
[App. No. 47, September Term, 1960.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided February 20, 1961.
POST CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT — Application Denied, Where Contentions Now Made Could Have Been, But Were Not, Raised On First Application For Relief, Which Was Denied In Trial Court. pp. 658-659
J.E.B.
Decided February 20, 1961.
Howard Traynham instituted a proceeding under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, and from a denial of relief, he applied for leave to appeal.
Application denied.
Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Application is denied for the reason that the contentions
Page 659
now made by applicant could have been but were not raised on his first application for post conviction relief, which was denied in the trial court.
Application denied.
135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…
244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…
Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…
John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…
127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…
34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…