Articles Tagged: 96 A. 398

96 A. 398 WILLIAM PATTERSON vs. ALICE PATTERSON. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided February 10th, 1915. Divorce: cruelty; violence; abusive language no justification. To justify a divorce on the grounds of cruelty, the causes must be grave and weighty, and such as show an absolute impossibility for the duties of the married life to […]

96 A. 398 FRANK E. BULLOCK vs. HENRY M. STAYLOR, ET AL. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided March 8th, 1915. Specific performance: decree compelling vendee to comply with contract of sale; title need not be free from every possible doubt; adverse possession. Where a bill for specific performance is brought, for the purpose of […]

96 A. 398 LOUIS C. HECKNER vs. MARGARET M. HECKNER. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided April 7th, 1915. Divorce: both parties guilty. Where each of the parties to a bill and cross-bill for divorce appears guilty of offenses that would be sufficient grounds for granting a divorce, the relief should be granted to neither. […]

96 A. 398 DAVID PEOPLES vs. DAVID V. AULT. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided April 16th, 1915. Decree for accounting: not granted when futile; books destroyed. Witnesses: unsworn testimony; when not admissible. Appeals: remanding for further proceedings under section 38 of Article 5 of the Code. A decree for an accounting will not be […]

96 A. 398 DAVID M. NEWBOLD vs. LAFAYETTE MILL AND LUMBER CO. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided April 16th, 1915. Bills and notes: endorsement; bill to have declared null; jurisdiction of equity. To warrant a court of equity in declaring the complainant’s endorsements on certain notes null and void, because of the fraudulent conduct […]