ROLFE v. CLARK, 269 Md. 14 (1973)

304 A.2d 231 ROLFE ET AL. v. CLARK ET AL., PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF BERTHA G. ROLFE [No. 271, September Term, 1972.]Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided May 14, 1973. NOTICE — Where The Function Of A Required Notice Is To Promote Information, Knowledge Is An Acceptable Equivalent. pp. 17-18 PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES — […]

Read More