200 A.2d 160 MATTINGLY ET AL. v. HOUSTON ET AL. [No. 273, September Term, 1963.]Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided May 11, 1964. DEEDS — Reformation — Mutual, Rather Than Unilateral, Mistake As To Location Of Boundary Line — Parties Intended To Locate Line According To Markers On The Land — Intent Continued Page 55 […]
