104 A. 368 RICHARD HENRY HOWARD AND MARTHA HOWARD, HIS WIFE, vs. DANIEL R. RANDALL, ATTORNEY, ETC. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 15th, 1918. Mortgages: foreclosure; advertisement; inaccuracy in record page; no ground for setting sale aside when original mortgage was filed; report of sale; what should show. In foreclosure proceedings, if the […]
Articles Tagged: 104 A. 368
BRADFORD v. MACKENZIE, 131 Md. 695 (1918)
104 A. 368 SAMUEL W. BRADFORD ET AL. vs. THOMAS W. MACKENZIE, COMMITTEE AND TRUSTEE OF CHARLES H. BRADFORD, A LUNATIC. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided February 20th, 1918. Wills: determinable fees. The third provision of the will of the late Governor was to the effect that, should either of his seven children die […]
IDDINS v. IDDINS, 131 Md. 690 (1917)
104 A. 368 HENRY IDDINS vs. CARRIE LOUISE IDDINS. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided December 12th, 1917. Divorce: abusive epithets; no excuse for violence. Personal violence by the husband is not justified by abusive terms applied to him by the wife, where it is shown that he frequently made use of the same terms […]
GROVE v. SNYDER, 131 Md. 694 (1918)
104 A. 368 F. DILLON GROVE vs. JACOB J. FUNK AND J.O. SNYDER, ADMINISTRATORS C.T.A. OF THE ESTATE OF LEWIS D. SNYDER, RECEIVER, DECEASED. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided February 13th, 1918. Evidence Acts: section 3 of Article 35; purposes of — . Conversations held with the decedents. The Evidence Acts, section 3 of […]
BURKENTINE v. MARYLAND, 131 Md. 691 (1918)
104 A. 368 PAUL R. BURKENTINE vs. STATE OF MARYLAND. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided December 13th, 1918. Bastardy: privilege of prosecuting witness in not answering questions. The privilege of the prosecuting witness in bastardy proceedings of not answering questions is personal to her, and not to the traverser. Decided December 13th, 1918. Appeal […]
THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. BLOEDE COMPANY, 131 Md. 689 (1917)
104 A. 368 THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, A CORPORATION, vs. THE VICTOR G. BLOEDE COMPANY, A CORPORATION. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided November 15th, 1917. Mistake in telegram delivered: damages. By mistake, a telegraph company made the offer, to deliver certain goods ordered, read at a lower figure than the one written in […]