MOLNAR v. CHILDRESS, 285 Md. 121 (1979)

400 A.2d 1106

GEORGE MOLNAR v. LILLIAN M. CHILDRESS

[No. 140, September Term, 1978.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided May 4, 1979.

APPEAL — Purposes Of Justice Will Be Advanced By A New Trial De Novo — Case Remanded For New Trial — Maryland Rule 871. pp. 121-122

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (CAHOON, J.), pursuant to certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, DIGGES, ELDRIDGE, ORTH, COLE and DAVIDSON, JJ.

William H. Clarke for appellant.

Sylman I. Euzent for appellee.

ORDER
It appearing, following oral argument in this Court, that the purposes of justice will be advanced by a new trial de novo in this action, it is, therefore, pursuant to Maryland Rule 871 and with the consent of all parties, this 4th day of May, 1979

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that this case be remanded to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, without affirmance or reversal, for a new trial upon

Page 122

the merits on all issues presented by the pleadings as if no appeal had been taken and the judgment from which this appeal was taken had not been entered; costs in this Court to abide the final result. Mandate shall issue forthwith.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

NOTTINGHAM v. STATE, 135 A.3d 541 (2016)

135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…

4 weeks ago

STATE v. SAYLES, 244 A.3d 1139 (Md. App. 2021)

244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…

2 years ago

MILBURN v. STATE, 1 Md. 1 (1851)

Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…

3 years ago

HANDY v. COLLINS, 60 Md. 229 (1883)

John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…

3 years ago

CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK, 445 A.3d 554 (2015)

127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…

5 years ago

STOP SLOTS MD 2008 v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 34 A.3d 1164 (2012)

34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…

7 years ago