140 A. 590
[No. 87, October Term, 1927.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided February 2d 1928.
Divorce — Cruelty.
The husband’s unreasonable insistence upon marital rights at a critical period in the wife’s life may amount to cruelty, entitling her to a divorce.
Decided February 2d 1928.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Harford County, In Equity (PRESTON, J.).
Bill by Mary Kelly Griest against Harold E. Griest. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., PATTISON, URNER, ADKINS, OFFUTT, DIGGES, PARKE, and SLOAN, JJ.
Frederick Lee Cobourn, for the appellant.
Robert H. Archer, for the appellee.
ADKINS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, affirming the decree, with costs to the appellee.
Unreported cases.
Page 697
135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…
244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…
Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…
John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…
127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…
34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…