DUKE v. DIRECTOR OF THE PATUXENT INSTITUTION, 233 Md. 639 (1964)

196 A.2d 890

DUKE v. DIRECTOR OF THE PATUXENT INSTITUTION

[App. No. 94, September Term, 1963.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided January 28, 1964.

George E. Duke instituted a proceeding under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, and from a denial of relief, he applied for leave to appeal.

Application denied.

Before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The application of George E. Duke for leave to appeal from the order denying him post conviction relief from his imprisonment for burglary is hereby denied for the reasons stated by Judge Harlan in the lower court. Insofar as the application states reasons for relief which were not raised below, such contentions cannot be considered in this proceeding.

Application denied.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 196 A.2d 890

Recent Posts

NOTTINGHAM v. STATE, 135 A.3d 541 (2016)

135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…

3 weeks ago

STATE v. SAYLES, 244 A.3d 1139 (Md. App. 2021)

244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…

2 years ago

MILBURN v. STATE, 1 Md. 1 (1851)

Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…

3 years ago

HANDY v. COLLINS, 60 Md. 229 (1883)

John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…

3 years ago

CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK, 445 A.3d 554 (2015)

127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…

5 years ago

STOP SLOTS MD 2008 v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 34 A.3d 1164 (2012)

34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…

7 years ago