DEMARCO v. DEMARCO, 159 Md. 699 (1930)

150 A. 281

SAMUEL DEMARCO v. LENA DEMARCO.

[No. 15, April Term, 1930.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided May 21st, 1930.

Divorce — Abandonment.

Testimony by the wife that her husband’s leaving her was not caused by her refusal to go with him to live with his parents, as alleged by him, was sufficiently corroborated by another’s testimony that after the separation the husband said that he was through with it all and would not take his wife back.

Decided May 21st, 1930.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (DUKE BOND, J.).

Bill by Lena Demarco v. Samuel Demarco. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., PATTISON, URNER, ADKINS, OFFUTT, DIGGES, and SLOAN, JJ.

Charles Jackson, for the appellant.

Arthur R. Padgett, with whom was Edwin J. Wolf on the brief, for the appellee.

BOND, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Unreported cases.

Page 700