269 A.2d 426

CUNNINGHAM v. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 1, September Term, 1970.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided October 12, 1970.

POST CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT — Denial Of — Based On Sound And Well Considered Opinion Of Lower Court. pp. 156-157

Application for leave to appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore (JONES, J.).

John W. Cunningham, sentenced to death, instituted a proceeding under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act, and from a denial of relief, he applies for leave to appeal.

Application denied.

Before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

John W. Cunningham seeks leave to appeal from denial of post conviction relief by Judge Shirley Jones, sitting in the Criminal Court of Baltimore. Cunningham was convicted of murder in the first degree in 1966 and the death penalty was imposed. The judgment was affirmed on appeal in Cunningham v. State, 247 Md. 404, cert. denied 390 U.S. 908, in which the contentions that (a) the State knowingly suppressed evidence that a State’s witness had been promised and had received immunity and leniency for his cooperation and knowingly used his false testimony implicating Cunningham as the murderer, and (b) the evidence given by another State’s witness was false and known to be false, were considered and rejected.

Before Judge Jones, Cunningham repeated these contentions and added the claim that his trial counsel had been incompetent. Judge Jones found against Cunningham on the facts and the law in a sound and well considered

Page 157

opinion. For the reasons given in that opinion, the application for leave to appeal is denied.

Application denied.

Tagged: