BORGMAN v. LASSAHN, 175 Md. 695 (1938)

2 A.2d 440

VERNON BORGMAN v. MATILDA LASSAHN ET AL

[No. 37, October Term, 1938.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided November 10th, 1938.

Life Tenant — Power of Sale — Exercise for Nominal Consideration.

The owner of property who, by a conveyance and reconveyance, constituted himself life tenant thereof, with remainder to his son, reserving to himself a power to sell, lease, mortgage, and incumber in any manner the absolute estate therein, including both the life estate and the remainder, could thereafter, on the death of the son named as remainderman, by a conveyance and reconveyance for a nominal consideration,

Page 696

again become life tenant, with remainder to another son, the exercise of the power reserved not requiring the support of an actual consideration.

Evidence of declarations by the original owner, afterwards life tenant, that his purpose in having the title changed was to substitute another remainderman for the son who had died, was properly excluded, it being irrelevant to the exercise of the reserved legal right.

Decided November 10th, 1938.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (DENNIS, C.J.).

Bill by Vernon Borgman, infant, by Helen Borgman, now Helen Tworek, his mother, guardian, and next friend, against Matilda A. Lassahn and others. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., URNER, OFFUTT, PARKE, MITCHELL, SHEHAN, and JOHNSON, JJ.

David Ash, with whom were Charles Jackson and Mark Jackson on the brief, for the appellant.

John J. Timanus, Daniel S. Sullivan, and Daniel S. Sullivan, Jr., submitting on brief, for the appellees.

URNER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Unreported cases.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 2 A.2d 440

Recent Posts

NOTTINGHAM v. STATE, 135 A.3d 541 (2016)

135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…

3 weeks ago

STATE v. SAYLES, 244 A.3d 1139 (Md. App. 2021)

244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…

2 years ago

MILBURN v. STATE, 1 Md. 1 (1851)

Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…

3 years ago

HANDY v. COLLINS, 60 Md. 229 (1883)

John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…

3 years ago

CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK, 445 A.3d 554 (2015)

127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…

5 years ago

STOP SLOTS MD 2008 v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 34 A.3d 1164 (2012)

34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…

7 years ago