BD. OF SCHOOL COMM’RS v. PATTERSON, 275 Md. 361 (1975)


339 A.2d 661

BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF BALTIMORE CITY ET AL. v. PATTERSON

[No. 47 (Adv.), September Term, 1975.]Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided June 27, 1975.

INJUNCTIONS — Circuit Court Was Without Jurisdiction To Enjoin School Board From Conducting A Scheduled Hearing Under Article VII, Sec. 58 (b) Of The Baltimore City Charter To Determine Whether The Superintendent Of Public Instruction Should Be Removed From Office. p. 362

Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (HOWARD, J.), pursuant to certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals.

Bill of complaint for injunction filed by Roland N. Patterson, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, to enjoin the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City from conducting a scheduled hearing to determine whether he should be removed from office. From an order granting the injunction, the Board appeals.

Order vacated and remanded with instructions.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and O’DONNELL, JJ.

Ambrose T. Hartman, Deputy City Solicitor, with whom wa Benjamin L. Brown, City Solicitor, on the brief, for appellants.

Larry S. Gibson, with whom were Charles Curtis Lee an Mitchell, Allen Lee on the brief, for appellee.

ORDER
PER CURIAM

The Court having considered the bill of complaint for injunction and the exhibits and affidavit filed therewith, the answer thereto, the order of the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City dated June 19, 1975 as supplemented by order dated June 20, 1975, briefs and arguments of counsel, and the Court having concluded that the Circuit Court No. 2

Page 362

of Baltimore City was without jurisdiction to enjoin the respondents from conducting a scheduled hearing under Article VII, Sec. 58(b) of the Baltimore City Charter to determine whether the Superintendent of Public Instruction should be removed from office, therefore, it is

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the orders of the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City are hereby vacated in their entirety and the case remanded with instructions that no further action in any way interfering with the holding of said hearing be taken prior to the completion thereof; and it is further

ORDERED that the mandate issue forthwith.

Page 363