ATT’Y GRIEVANCE v. BUTLER, 419 Md. 626 (2011)

20 A.3d 103

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Anthony Ignatius BUTLER, Jr., Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 33, September Term 2010.Court of Appeals of Maryland.
May 18, 2011.

ORDER
The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 18th day of May, 2011;

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Anthony Ignatius Butler, Jr., be, and he is hereby, reprimanded and it is further

ORDERED, that judgment shall be entered in favor of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, in the amount of $1,122.00 for costs against the Respondent.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 20 A.3d 103

Recent Posts

NOTTINGHAM v. STATE, 135 A.3d 541 (2016)

135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…

1 week ago

STATE v. SAYLES, 244 A.3d 1139 (Md. App. 2021)

244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…

2 years ago

MILBURN v. STATE, 1 Md. 1 (1851)

Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…

3 years ago

HANDY v. COLLINS, 60 Md. 229 (1883)

John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…

3 years ago

CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK, 445 A.3d 554 (2015)

127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…

5 years ago

STOP SLOTS MD 2008 v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 34 A.3d 1164 (2012)

34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…

7 years ago