ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE v. ROY, 418 Md. 585 (2011)

16 A.3d 976

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OP MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Kevin Michael ROY, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 82, Sept. Term 2010.Court of Appeals of Maryland.
April 8, 2011.

ORDER
The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent, Kevin M. Roy, pursuant to Mary-land Rule 16-772(b). Upon review of said Joint Petition and for reasons set forth therein, it is this 8th day of April, 2011,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Kevin M. Roy, be, and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 1.4(a)(2) and (3), 1.16(d), and 8.4(d).

Page 586

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 16 A.3d 976

Recent Posts

NOTTINGHAM v. STATE, 135 A.3d 541 (2016)

135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…

4 weeks ago

STATE v. SAYLES, 244 A.3d 1139 (Md. App. 2021)

244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…

2 years ago

MILBURN v. STATE, 1 Md. 1 (1851)

Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…

3 years ago

HANDY v. COLLINS, 60 Md. 229 (1883)

John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…

3 years ago

CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK, 445 A.3d 554 (2015)

127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…

5 years ago

STOP SLOTS MD 2008 v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 34 A.3d 1164 (2012)

34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…

7 years ago