ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE v. PAGE, 389 Md. 122 (2005)

883 A.2d 912

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Alfred PAGE, Jr., Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 79, September Term, 2004.Court of Appeals of Maryland.
September 29, 2005.

ORDER
The parties herein have jointly Petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 29TH day of September, 2005,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Alfred Page, Jr., be, and is hereby, reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED, that Respondent shall obtain an escrow and practice monitor for a period of two (2) years commencing thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, with the monitor making monthly reports to the Office of Bar Counsel for the first six months and quarterly reports thereafter; and it is further

Ordered, that judgment be entered in favor of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, in the amount of $148.25 for costs against the Respondent, Alfred Page, Jr.

Page 123

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 883 A.2d 912

Recent Posts

NOTTINGHAM v. STATE, 135 A.3d 541 (2016)

135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…

3 weeks ago

STATE v. SAYLES, 244 A.3d 1139 (Md. App. 2021)

244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…

2 years ago

MILBURN v. STATE, 1 Md. 1 (1851)

Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…

3 years ago

HANDY v. COLLINS, 60 Md. 229 (1883)

John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…

3 years ago

CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK, 445 A.3d 554 (2015)

127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…

5 years ago

STOP SLOTS MD 2008 v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 34 A.3d 1164 (2012)

34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…

7 years ago