ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE v. MIXTER, 403 Md. 463 (2008)

943 A.2d 615

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Mark Thomas MIXTER, Respondent.

No. Misc. Docket AG No. 71, September Term, 2007.Court of Appeals of Maryland.
March 7, 2008.

ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed herein, and in consideration of the facts set forth therein, it is this 7th day of March, 2008

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Mark T. Mixter, be, and he is hereby reprimanded, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall give the notice required by Maryland Rule 16-723(e).

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 943 A.2d 615

Recent Posts

NOTTINGHAM v. STATE, 135 A.3d 541 (2016)

135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…

3 weeks ago

STATE v. SAYLES, 244 A.3d 1139 (Md. App. 2021)

244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…

2 years ago

MILBURN v. STATE, 1 Md. 1 (1851)

Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…

3 years ago

HANDY v. COLLINS, 60 Md. 229 (1883)

John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…

3 years ago

CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK, 445 A.3d 554 (2015)

127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…

5 years ago

STOP SLOTS MD 2008 v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 34 A.3d 1164 (2012)

34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…

7 years ago