ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE v. IWEANOGE, 391 Md. 686 (2006)

894 A.2d 1135

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. John O. IWEANOGE, Jr., Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 21, September Term, 2005.Court of Appeals of Maryland.
March 22, 2006.

ORDER
The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of the said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 22nd day of March, 2006

ORDERED, that the Respondent, JOHN O. IWEANOGE, JR., be, and he is hereby reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4(a) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Page 687

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

NOTTINGHAM v. STATE, 135 A.3d 541 (2016)

135 A.3d 541 (2016)227 Md.App. 592 George Doran NOTTINGHAM v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1602,…

1 week ago

STATE v. SAYLES, 244 A.3d 1139 (Md. App. 2021)

244 A.3d 1139 (2021)472 Md. 207 STATE of Maryland v. Karon SAYLES. State of Maryland…

2 years ago

MILBURN v. STATE, 1 Md. 1 (1851)

Alexander Milburn and his Securities, vs. The State of Maryland. Dec. 1851 · Court of Appeals of…

3 years ago

HANDY v. COLLINS, 60 Md. 229 (1883)

John H. Handy vs. Frances C. Collins, Executrix of William H. Collins June 19, 1883 · Court…

3 years ago

CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK, 445 A.3d 554 (2015)

127 A.3d 554 (2015)445 Md. 364 Kathleen CLOUGH v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF HURLOCK. No.…

5 years ago

STOP SLOTS MD 2008 v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 34 A.3d 1164 (2012)

34 A.3d 1164 (2012)424 Md. 163 STOP SLOTS MD 2008, et al. v. STATE BOARD…

7 years ago